DOJ POLICIES AND MANUALSSELECT USSC REPORTSHELPFUL SENTENCING RESOURCESOTHER MATERIALS This section provides manuals, select Commission reports, DOJ documents, legislative testimony, and other resources that may be helpful in arguing for a non-guidelines sentence under 18 U.S.C. §3553(a). In addition, please find other useful information covering specific sentencing issues. DOJ POLICIES AND MANUALS CHARGING AND SENTENCING POLICIES Attorney General Jeff Sessions Memorandum to All Federal Prosecutors from Attorney General Jeff Sessions to All Federal Prosecutors on Department Charging and Sentencing Policy (May 10, 2017) Memorandum to All Federal Prosecutors from Jeff Sessions, Attorney General, to All Federal Prosecutors on Commitment to Targeting Violent Crime (March 8, 2017) Attorney General Eric H. Holder, Jr. Summary of DOJ Charging Policies under Eric H. Holder, Jr. Memorandum to All Federal Prosecutors from Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General on § 851 Enhancements in Plea Negotiations (Sept. 24, 2014) Memorandum from Eric H. Holder, Jr. Attorney General, to the U.S. Attorneys and Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division on Retroactive Application of Department Policy on Charging Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Recidivist Enhancements in Certain Drug Cases (Aug. 29, 2013) Memorandum from Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, to the United States Attorneys and Assistant Attorney General for the Criminal Division on Department Policy on Charging Mandatory Minimum Sentences and Recidivist Enhancements in Certain Drug Cases (Aug. 12, 2013) Memorandum to All Federal Prosecutors from Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General, Department Policy on Charging and Sentencing (May 19, 2010) Deputy Attorney General James Comey Memorandum to All Federal Prosecutors from James Comey, Deputy Attorney General, Department Policies and Procedures Concerning Sentencing (January 28, 2005) Memorandum to All Federal Prosecutors from James Comey, Deputy Attorney General, Department Legal Positions and Policies in Light of Blakely v. Washington (July 2, 2004) Attorney General John Ashcroft Memorandum to All Federal Prosecutors from John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Department Policy Concerning Charging Criminal Offenses, Disposition of Charges, and Sentencing (September 22, 2003) Memorandum to All Federal Prosecutors from John Ashcroft, Attorney General, Department Policies and Procedures Concerning Sentencing Recommendations and Sentencing Appeals (July 28, 2003) Attorney General Janet Reno Reno Bluesheet on Charging and Plea Decisions to Holders of U.S. Attorneys' Manual, Title 9 from Janet Reno, Attorney General, Principles of Federal Prosecution(October 12, 1993) Acting Attorney General George J. Terwilliger, III Memorandum to Holders of U.S. Attorneys' Manual, Title 9 from George J. Terwilliger, III, Acting Attorney General, Indictment and Plea Procedures Under Guideline Sentencing (February 7, 1992) Attorney General Dick Thornburgh Memorandum to Federal Prosecutors from Dick Thornburgh, Attorney General, Plea Bargaining Under The Sentencing Reform Act (March 13, 1989) MANUALS United States Attorneys’ Manual, Title 9 – Criminal Division (1984) REPORTS An Analysis of Non-Violent Drug Offenders with Minimal Criminal Histories: Part I & Part II (February 4, 1994) (U.S. Department of Justice) (finding that a substantial number of minor role drug offenders with minimal criminal histories "are much less likely than high-level defendants to re-offend" and "a short prison sentence is just as likely to deter them from future offending as a long prison sentence.") SELECT USSC REPORTS Status of Plea Agreements Received by the U.S. Sentencing Commission Nationwide -- Fiscal Years 2010-2016 United States Sentencing Commission's Interactive Sourcebook of Federal Sentencing Statistics and How to Use the Sentencing Commission's Interactive Sourcebook Supplementary Report on the Initial Sentencing Guidelines and Policy Statements (1987) United States Sentencing Commission This publication was issued by the Commission in 1987, shortly after the first edition of the guidelines was submitted to Congress. It is a primary source for "legislative history" of the guidelines. It supplements and further explains the guidelines, policy statements and commentary, and includes the results of the Commission's "past practice study" mentioned by Justice Breyer in Rita v. United States, 127 S. Ct. 2456, 2464 (2007). See Important Developments at the Sentencing Commission HELPFUL SENTENCING RESOURCES SRC RESOURCES Fact Sheet: USSC Report on Racial Disparity is Flawed and Being Misused (Jan. 2018) Social Science at Sentencing: An Annotated Bibliographyby Denise C. Barrett and Laura E. Mate, Sentencing Resource Counsel Project Recent research in criminology and other related social and behavioral sciences provides empirical evidence relevant to the purposes of sentencing. This document identifies resources that may be helpful in plea negotiations and sentencing advocacy. Fighting Fiction with Fact to Attain Lower Sentencesby Laura E. Mate, Denise C. Barrett, and Anne E. Blanchard, Sentencing Resource Counsel Project (Listing research that practitioners can use to debunk common sentencing myths.) Collateral Consequences Resource Listby Denise Barrett and Sara Silva of the Sentencing Resource Counsel Project (This resource list is designed to serve as a starting point for exploring the collateral consequences of convictions and imprisonment and for educating your judge about these "invisible punishments.") Federal Public Defender’s Office Sentencing Resource Manual: Using Statistics and Studies to Redefine the Purposes of SentencingEdited by Jennifer Coffin, Research & Writing Specialist, Federal Public Defender's Office, M.D. TN; Sarah Gannett, Research & Writing Specialist, Federal Public Defender's Office, D. MD; Molly Roth, Assistant Federal Public Defender, W.D. TX A compilation of useful resources that federal defense attorneys can consult when drafting sentencing memoranda and making oral arguments for sentences below the advisory guideline range. See Sentencing Resource Counsel Project Summaries of Prior Amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines here. LITIGATING VICTIMS RIGHTS ISSUES Rights and Procedures Under the Crime Victims' Rights Act and New Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (April 2009)by Amy Baron-Evans OTHER SENTENCING RESOURCES National Inventory of the Collateral Consequences of Conviction This Inventory, created by the ABA Criminal Justice Section, is the first effort to systematically collect in one place the collateral consequences of conviction that exist in the laws and regulations of every state and in the federal system. NACDL Restoration of Rights Project This resource provides a collection of individual downloadable documents that profile the law and practice in each U.S. jurisdiction relating to relief from the collateral consequences of conviction. The profiles include provisions on loss and restoration of civil rights and firearms privileges, legal mechanisms for overcoming or mitigating collateral consequences, and provisions addressing non-discrimination in employment and licensing. In addition to the 54 jurisdictional profiles, there is a set of 50-state charts that make it possible to see national patterns in restoration laws and policies. Collateral Consequences Resource Center Through its website the CCRC provides news and commentary about developments in courts and legislatures, curates practice and advocacy resources, and provides information about how to obtain relief from collateral consequences in various jurisdictions. Five Things About Deterrence (July 2014)National Institute of Justice This DOJ publication confirms that longer sentences do not deter crime. The Growth of Incarceration in the United States: Exploring Causes and Consequences National Research Council This report concludes that given the minimal impact of long prison sentences on crime prevention and the negative social consequences and burdensome financial costs of U.S. incarceration rates, which have more than quadrupled in the last four decades, the nation should revise current criminal justice policies to significantly reduce imprisonment rates. OTHER MATERIALS Defender Letter to Lanny Breuer Regarding Speech at the American Lawyer/National Law Journal SummitBy David E. Patton, Executive Director, Federal Defenders of New York, Inc.; Margy Meyers, Federal Public Defender, S.D.TX; and Henry Bemporad, Federal Public Defender, W.D. TX In this letter, the authors respond to a November 15, 2011 speech by Lanny Breuer, in which he stated, "In short, many prosecutors, defense lawyers, and judges agree that more and more, the length of a defendant's sentence depends primarily on the identity of the judge assigned to the case, and the district in which he or she is in." The authors demonstrate that sentencing "disparities have far more to do with the types of cases that arise in each district, and the prosecution policies that local federal prosecutors have chosen to address these cases" than the identity of the sentencing judge. Memo From AO Dir. Mecham re Statement of Reasons Aug. 13 2001 This 2001 memo discusses the policy change restricting routine public disclosure of the Statement of Reasons and revised forms for judgments in a criminal case. Allocution Pleading and The Story Behind the Allocution Pleading (Instructions & Client Questionnaire) developed by Tony Lacy, Assistant Federal Public Defender, W.D. OK This allocution pleading is created from a set of questions designed to elicit the client's thoughts regarding the predicament he faces, personal circumstances, the sentencing process and sentencing factors. Counsel across the country have used it countless times since Booker, either as a stand alone pleading or as part of a combined sentencing pleading. Your Client Will Not Get Mental Health Treatment in Prison: A Primer on How to Back Up That Claimby James Tibensky, Mitigation Specialist, Federal Defender Program of Chicago This article sets forth data to support an argument that a client should receive a non-prison sentence based on lack of access to mental health treatment through the Bureau of Prisons. TESTIMONY Testimony from Joint Economic Committee Hearing on Negative Impacts of Mass Incarceration On October 4, 2007, the joint House and Senate Economic Committee held a hearing to "examine why the United States has such a disproportionate share of the world's prison population, as well as ways to address this issue that responsibly balance public safety and the high social and economic costs of imprisonment." The testimony and data from this hearing provide valuable information that may help you create or support sentencing arguments.