Skip to main content

Appeals

Supreme Court Declines To Hear Death-Row Inmate’s Claim of Juror’s Racial Bias

The Supreme Court on Monday turned away an appeal from a death row inmate in Texas who said his jury had been tainted by racial bias (view full article).

The justices refused to hear the case of Kristopher Love, a Black man who was sentenced to death in Texas, after he objected to the seating of a juror who had said he believed “nonwhite races” to be the “more violent races.”

Circuit Split On ATM Stickups Over the Real Victim: You or Bank?

If someone is held at gunpoint and forced to withdraw money from an ATM, is the bank being robbed (a federal crime) or just the person (not a federal crime)? Seventh Circuit (2005): The bank - because the money belongs to the bank. Fifth Circuit (2005):  The person - because the money belongs to the account holder. Tenth Circuit (last week): Bank - because the money belongs to the bank.

SCOTUS To Decide If Ariz.R.Crim.P. 32.1(g) Is An Independent & Adequate State Law Ground

The Supreme Court granted certiorari in Cruz v. Arizona, No. 21-846 (Mar. 28, 2022) (cert. granted), to decide “[w]hether the Arizona Supreme Court’s holding that Arizona Rule of Criminal Procedure 32.1 (g) precluded post-conviction relief is an adequate and independent state-law ground for the judgment.

Fifth Circuit Says 'Oops' Where Lawyer Represented Client and Government Star Witness

Fifth Circuit: "Ann Sheperd, the owner of a home-health agency, lawyered up after being indicted for Medicare fraud. But there was a tiny problem: Unbeknownst to Sheperd, her pretrial lawyer—who represented her until days before trial—also represented one of the Government's star witnesses. Oops." Remand for a hearing to determine whether lawyer's conflict of interest affected representation.

The case is United States v. Sheperd, 19-20073 (5th Cir. Mar. 8, 2022).

Supreme Court Rejects Armed Career Criminal Act Sentence

Today the Supreme Court decided Wooden v. United States, No. 20-5279 (S. Ct. March 7, 2022) soundly tossing out a sentencing enhancement for a Georgia man who was designated a “career criminal” based on his burglary convictions for breaking into a single mini-storage facility and stealing items from 10 separate storage units. Previous coverage available here and here.

Fourth Circuit Suppresses Warrantless Seach Where No Danger To Police Existed

Two Richmond, Va. police approached a man walking on the street whom they believe match the description of a suspect. Cops: "Yo! Let me talk to you real quick" and motioned man to come over. Man: "Nah" and kept walking. Cop: Yo! Hey! And continued towards man. Man: about to take off running but immediately trips and fall. Cops tackle and arrest man, then searched the bag the man had on him, which contained a gun and box of ammunition. Man: firearm and un-Mirandized statements made after gun found should be suppressed. District court: no, cops had reasonable suspicion.

Ninth Circuit Vacates Conviction Based on Insufficient Evidence

Sufficiency-of-the-evidence challenges to a criminal conviction are notoriously difficult to win. California man and alleged gang member charged with drug conspiracy. Man: I left gang and bought drugs for my use. Contacts with gang is for friendship purpose. Jury: we believe defense and prosecution. Acquits on some distribution charges; convicts on drug distribution conspiracy and gun charges. Man appeals.