Post-Booker/Fanfan Decisions Smith, D.C. Cir. 3/18/05 (6th Amend. claim not preserved when def. failed to raise at resentencing on remand; def. could not establish prejudice as to sentence above range) Coles, D.C. Cir. 4/8/05 (remanded, in assessing whether Booker error prejudicial must determine whether would have been materially different result) Miller, D.C. Cir. 1/18/05 (pre-Booker op. but assuming Blakely applied, could consider nature and timing of priors)